feat: replace BundlePoller polling with SSE streaming by Evalir · Pull Request #269 · init4tech/builder

Evalir · 2026-04-23T21:28:35Z

Description

Mirrors #259 (tx-poller SSE) for bundles. Replaces the 1s polling loop in BundlePoller with an SSE subscription to /bundles/feed via BuilderTxCache::subscribe_bundles (newly exposed by the SDK, matched by the tx-pool-webservice endpoint).

The structure matches TxPoller exactly:

Initial full_fetch paginates through stream_bundles to seed the cache on startup.
subscribe opens the SSE stream and yields CachedBundles in real time.
On stream error / stream end, reconnects with exponential backoff (1s → 30s cap), racing the sleep against the block-env watcher so an env change wins and triggers a fresh full refetch immediately.
On block-env change, the full_fetch runs again to cover anything missed during disconnection.
NotOurSlot is logged at trace level (expected when the builder is not slot-permissioned) in both the full-fetch and subscribe paths — avoids spurious warn-level noise.

The public check_bundle_cache() wrapper is dropped; the integration test now uses BuilderTxCache::stream_bundles directly, matching the style of tx_poller_test.rs.

Related Issue

Stacked on #259.

Testing

make fmt passes
make clippy passes
make test passes
cargo doc --no-deps passes with -D warnings
cargo test --features test-utils --no-run builds all integration tests
Exercise against a live tx-pool-webservice to verify SSE reconnect and env-driven refetch behavior end-to-end

Evalir · 2026-04-23T21:28:48Z

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

feat: replace BundlePoller polling with SSE streaming #269 👈 (View in Graphite)
feat: replace TxPoller polling with SSE streaming #259
main

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

Mirrors the TxPoller SSE change: subscribe to /bundles/feed via BuilderTxCache::subscribe_bundles for real-time delivery of new bundles, with an initial full_fetch on startup/block-env change and exponential backoff reconnect on error or stream end. Drops the 1s polling loop.

Mirrors PR #259's 9bc0ff4 split applied to BundlePoller. Restore check_bundle_cache as a private pure-fetch helper returning Result<Vec<CachedBundle>, _>, and rename full_fetch to fetch_and_forward — its name now matches what it does (fetch + forward to the outbound channel). Use let-else over the fetch result to drop a level of indentation.

dylanlott

We should test these changes in Parmigiana asap before taking to mainnet.

dylanlott · 2026-04-28T01:13:32Z

-                time::sleep(self.poll_duration()).await;
-                continue;
-            };
+    async fn task_future(mut self, outbound: mpsc::UnboundedSender<CachedBundle>) {


should span this and pass the span to the lifecycle methods as necessary

and as I think about it more, we probably want to add at least the block number to span's log fields.

[Claude Code]

Done in 13b25a4 — task_future now carries an #[instrument] span with url and block_number fields. block_number is recorded on startup and re-recorded on every env-change branch so the field tracks the current block. The lifecycle methods (fetch_and_forward, subscribe, reconnect, handle_sse_item) inherit this span automatically via async context propagation, so I dropped the redundant per-method trace_span!s.

dylanlott · 2026-04-28T02:15:05Z


-            // Check this here to avoid making the web request if we know
-            // we don't need the results.
-            if outbound.is_closed() {


This check is removed from this arm, but it's still called in the tx cache arm. Need to check outbound.is_closed somewhere in this arm. In its current state, the simulator could drop its receiver while the SSE is in the error or none branch and would repeat its reconnection loop forever.

[Claude Code]

Done in 13b25a4 — added an if outbound.is_closed() { break; } guard at the top of task_future's select loop, plus an early outbound.is_closed() check at the top of reconnect's loop body. Together those break the forever-reconnect cycle: if the simulator drops its receiver while we're stuck in a stream error/None loop, the next iteration of either loop exits cleanly.

dylanlott · 2026-04-28T02:30:39Z

+                BuilderTxCacheError::TxCache(TxCacheError::NotOurSlot) => {
+                    trace!("Not our slot to subscribe to bundles");
+                }
+                _ => warn!(%error, "Failed to open SSE bundle subscription"),


should add a metric for SSE failures in the subscribe loop to match the inc_tx_poll_errors() in the fetch and dispatch loop.

[Claude Code]

Done in 13b25a4 — added inc_sse_subscribe_errors and called it from subscribe's inspect_err. Used a generic name (no bundle_ prefix) to match the existing inc_sse_reconnect_attempts pattern; tx.rs can adopt the same helper later without renaming.

dylanlott · 2026-04-28T02:31:33Z

+        outbound: &mpsc::UnboundedSender<CachedBundle>,
+        backoff: &mut Duration,
+    ) -> SseStream {
+        tokio::select! {


should add a metric like inc_tx_sse_reconnects() as well

[Claude Code]

Done in 13b25a4 — BundlePoller::reconnect now increments the existing inc_sse_reconnect_attempts counter once per attempt, matching how TxPoller::reconnect uses it. Also generalized the metric's description from "SSE transaction stream reconnect attempts" to "SSE stream reconnect attempts" since both pollers share it.

Fraser999

We could use actual integration tests for this stream and the tx stream (I think the existing one is more like a connectivity smoke test). Not blocking, but worth a follow-up ticket?

Addresses dylanlott + Fraser999 comments on the BundlePoller SSE PR: - Wrap task_future with #[instrument], adding url + block_number fields to the parent span; record block_number on every env change so tracing reflects current state. (dylan) - Guard the task_future select loop with outbound.is_closed() so a dropped consumer breaks the loop instead of letting reconnect retry forever. (dylan) - Subscribe now returns Option<SseStream>; reconnect loops internally with backoff until it gets a real stream or the outbound closes (returning Option). Kills the misleading double warn ("Failed to open SSE bundle subscription" + "stream ended") on subscribe failure. (Fraser/Claude) - Add inc_sse_subscribe_errors metric, called from subscribe's error path. Generic name (not bundle-specific) since the existing inc_sse_reconnect_attempts is also generic. (dylan) - Increment inc_sse_reconnect_attempts in BundlePoller::reconnect, matching tx.rs. (dylan) - Bump "Block env changed" log from trace to debug, matching the agreed change on tx.rs. (Fraser) - Generalize SSE_RECONNECT_ATTEMPTS_HELP from "transaction stream" to just "SSE stream" since the metric is shared. Defers (per plan): renaming "poll" metrics to "fetch" — that's a cross-cutting metrics rename that should ride in its own PR.

- Collapse the duplicated reconnect match arms in handle_sse_item into let-else, matching the project's terse Option/Result style. - Promote record_block_number from a free fn to a &self method, shrinking the call sites and using SimEnv::rollup_block_number() instead of inlining the rollup_env().number.to::<u64>() chain. - Drop a stray WHAT-comment on reconnect's loop tail.

Fraser999 · 2026-04-29T13:28:31Z

+    #[instrument(
+        skip_all,
+        fields(url = %self.config.tx_pool_url, block_number = tracing::field::Empty),
+    )]


This is a long-running task under normal conditions, so shouldn't be instrumented like this I believe. Maybe something more like how we do instrumentation in SubmitTask::task_future would work better? That would also avoid the call to Span::current() inside record_block_number which can be flaky depending on the runtime log level chosen.

Fraser999 · 2026-04-29T13:30:44Z

-        let (outbound, inbound) = unbounded_channel();
+    fn record_block_number(&self) {
+        if let Some(env) = self.envs.borrow().as_ref() {
+            Span::current().record("block_number", env.rollup_block_number());


I think we use sim.ru.number for this elsewhere rather than block_number.

Evalir mentioned this pull request Apr 23, 2026

feat: replace TxPoller polling with SSE streaming #259

Open

3 tasks

Evalir force-pushed the evalir/eop/sse-bundle-poller branch from b4f7193 to 8c472ae Compare April 23, 2026 21:45

Evalir changed the base branch from evalir/eop/sse-tx-poller to graphite-base/269 April 27, 2026 11:33

Evalir marked this pull request as ready for review April 27, 2026 11:34

Evalir requested review from Fraser999, dylanlott and prestwich as code owners April 27, 2026 11:34

Evalir force-pushed the evalir/eop/sse-bundle-poller branch from 8c472ae to 58c25a1 Compare April 27, 2026 11:38

Evalir changed the base branch from graphite-base/269 to evalir/eop/sse-tx-poller April 27, 2026 11:39

dylanlott requested changes Apr 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

Fraser999 reviewed Apr 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread src/tasks/cache/bundle.rs Outdated

Comment thread src/tasks/cache/bundle.rs

Comment thread src/tasks/cache/bundle.rs

Evalir changed the base branch from evalir/eop/sse-tx-poller to graphite-base/269 April 28, 2026 15:54

Evalir requested review from Fraser999 and dylanlott April 29, 2026 09:54

Fraser999 reviewed Apr 29, 2026

View reviewed changes

Conversation

Evalir commented Apr 23, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Related Issue

Testing

Uh oh!

Evalir commented Apr 23, 2026

Uh oh!

dylanlott left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Fraser999 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

3 participants

Evalir commented Apr 23, 2026 •

edited

Loading